Table of Contents
Important Ethics Terminology UPSC and UPPCS Ethics (GS IV)
1. Moral intuition and Moral reasoning
Moral intuition and moral reasoning both are distinct processes of moral judgments and decisions.
Moral Intuition/Intuition:
Moral intuition refers to our immediate, automatic, unconscious and instinctive sense of right and wrong.It’s often described as a “gut feeling” about the morality of an action or situation. Moral intuitions can be influenced by our upbringing, culture, emotions, and evolutionary history.
If you see someone stealing a purse, your immediate reaction to feel that it’s wrong is a moral intuition. This response happens quickly, without conscious deliberation.
Ex. Help to needy
Don’t confuse with Conscience:
- Intuition – gut-feeling
- Conscience – inner sense of right and wrong
Moral Reasoning:
Moral reasoning is the conscious, justifiable, rational, deliberate process of thinking through a moral issue, considering various principles, rules, and possible consequences to arrive at a moral judgment or decision.
For example, consider a situation where a doctor must decide whether to allocate a single available organ to one of two patients. The doctor engages in moral reasoning by evaluating various factors: the urgency of each patient’s condition, their chances of recovery, their overall contribution to society, and ethical guidelines about fairness and equality. This thoughtful process of weighing these considerations to make a decision illustrates moral reasoning.
Other examples:
- Deciding whether to report a friend’s academic dishonesty.
- Determining the ethical implications of a new technology.
- Evaluating the fairness of a company’s labour practices.
Both moral intuition and moral reasoning play vital roles in ethical decision-making. Intuition provides immediate moral guidance, often necessary for quick decisions, while reasoning allows for thorough and justifiable judgments in more complex situations.
2. Ethical management vs Management of ethics
The terms “ethical management” and “management of ethics” might seem similar, but they refer to two related yet distinct aspects of organizational behavior and decision-making.
Ethical Management: This refers to the practice of incorporating ethical principles and standards to management behaviors and decisions. It involves understanding the impact of management decisions on different stakeholders (employees, customers, communities, etc.) and making choices that are not only beneficial to the organization but are also just, fair, and morally right. Ethical management often includes practices like transparency, accountability, fairness, and respect for stakeholder rights. It is about integrating ethics into all aspects of management, including strategy, operations, human resources management, etc.
Management of Ethics: This, on the other hand, refers to the systems and processes organizations put in place to ensure ethical behavior among its members to increase social capital. It involves creating and implementing ethical policies and codes of conduct, setting up mechanisms to monitor compliance with these policies, and managing the consequences for unethical behavior. The management of ethics might include efforts like ethics training, creating an ethics hotline, appointing an ethics officer, etc. It’s about the structures, procedures, and systems that help ensure ethical behavior in an organization.
In summary, ethical management is about how managers incorporate ethical principles into their decision-making and behavior, while the management of ethics is about how organizations establish systems and processes to promote ethical behavior among all its members. Both are crucial for creating an ethical organizational culture and promoting responsible business practices.
3. Discrimination vs Preferential treatment
“Discrimination” and “preferential treatment” are two concepts that are often brought up in discussions of fairness and justice, particularly in contexts such as employment, education, and public services. Both involve making distinctions between individuals or groups, but the connotations and impacts of these concepts can be quite different.
Discrimination: This refers to unfair or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or religion. Discrimination can be direct (where someone is treated less favorably because of a protected characteristic) or indirect (where a seemingly neutral policy has an unfavorable impact on individuals with a certain protected characteristic). Discrimination is generally viewed as harmful and unjust, and many laws have been established to prevent discriminatory practices.
Preferential Treatment: This refers to giving advantages or benefits to a particular person or group over others. It’s not inherently negative and can sometimes be used as a tool to redress historical injustices or create more diverse and inclusive environments. For example, affirmative action policies in education and employment are a form of preferential treatment designed to increase opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups. However, preferential treatment can become problematic if it results in unfairness or discrimination against other groups.
In summary, discrimination involves treating individuals unfairly based on certain characteristics, while preferential treatment involves giving advantages to certain individuals or groups. Both concepts highlight the importance of considering fairness, justice, and equality in how we treat others.
4. Moral muteness
Moral muteness refers to a situation where individuals or organizations fail to communicate their moral beliefs, values, or concerns in their decision-making or behavior.
Moral muteness refers to the phenomenon where individuals/organisation observe unethical behavior but choose to remain silent rather than addressing it. It’s a pervasive issue across various societal spheres, from workplaces to communities.
Ex. – Women’s harassment by rain revellers in Lucknow.
Causes of Moral Muteness
Individual Factors
- Fear of Retaliation
- Doubt and Uncertainty on their own judgment
- Lack of Confidence
- Lack of Courage
- Sense of loyalty to the organization
- Career Concerns
- Self interest
Organizational Factors
- Culture of Silence, discourages dissent or whistleblowing
- Lack of Ethical Leadership
- Reward Systems prioritize short-term gains over ethical considerations
- Ineffective Reporting Mechanisms
- Systemic Pressure
Societal Factors
- Desire for Harmonious Relationships
- Normative Pressure
- Conformity Pressure
- Lack of legal protection
- Power Dynamics, Unequal power relationships
- Bystander Effect
Moral muteness can be problematic as it can lead to unethical decisions or actions going unchallenged. It can also contribute to a culture where moral considerations are not seen as relevant or important. To combat moral muteness, it is important to foster environments where open and respectful moral and ethical discussions are encouraged and valued.
5. Moral Myopia
Moral myopia is a distortion of moral vision that prevents moral issues from coming clearly into focus. It’s a term used to describe situations where individuals or organizations fail to recognize the moral dimensions of a decision or action, often due to biases, self-interest, or situational factors. i.e., Moral myopia refers to the inability to see ethical issues clearly.
Use of fossil fuel cause environment damage.
Moral myopia can manifest in several ways:
- Rationalization of unethical behavior
- Justify harmful environmental practices by emphasizing the economic benefits.
- Euphemistic Language
- Try can mask the moral implications of an action
- layoffs as “downsizing” or “right-sizing”
- Greenwashing, pinkwashing
- Social Normalization of unethical behavior
- Overemphasis on Goals
- Diffusion of Responsibility
- Feel less personally accountable for their actions and overlook the moral implications.
- This often happens in large organizations or bureaucratic systems.
- Conformity Pressure/bias:
- The desire to align with the group’s behavior or expectations or conform can also lead to moral myopia.
Moral myopia can lead to unethical decisions and actions. It’s important for organizations and individuals to actively work to recognize and combat moral myopia, for example, by promoting ethical awareness, encouraging open discussions about ethics, holding individuals accountable for their actions, and fostering a culture where ethical behavior is valued and rewarded.
6. Cognitive bias
Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that affect the decisions and judgments that people make. These biases are often a result of our brain’s attempt to simplify information processing. They are a common part of human cognition and often work as mental shortcuts or “heuristics” that allow us to make decisions quickly. However, they can also lead to perceptual distortion, inaccurate judgment, and illogical interpretation.
There are many different types of cognitive biases.
- Confirmation Bias: This is the tendency to interpret information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities.
- Conformity bias: This is the tendency to behave similarly to others within a group, even if it means going against their own judgment or disregarding their personal beliefs and values. The bias is driven by the desire to fit in and be accepted by others. It is also known as social conformity.
- Anchoring Bias: This is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information encountered (the “anchor”) when making decisions.
- Self-Serving Bias: This is the tendency to attribute positive events to one’s own character but attribute negative events to external factors. It’s a common type of bias that helps maintain self-esteem.
- Fundamental Attribution Error: This is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics to explain someone else’s behavior in a given situation, rather than considering the situation’s external factors.
- Beauty lie in the eye of beholder.
- Savan ke andhe ko sab hra hra dikhna.
- Availability Heuristic: This is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events with greater “availability” in memory, which can be influenced by how recent the memories are or how emotionally charged they are.
- Hindsight Bias: This is the tendency to see past events as being more predictable than they were at the time they occurred. It’s often referred to as the “I-knew-it-all-along” effect.
Understanding cognitive biases can help us make more rational decisions, improve our judgments, and understand others better. It’s important to note that everyone is susceptible to these biases, and being aware of them is the first step towards mitigating their effects.
7. Bounded ethicality UPSC
“Bounded ethicality” refers to the concept that even when individuals have the best of intentions, their ethical decision-making can be unintentionally flawed or limited due to cognitive biases, societal pressures, or lack of full awareness about the ethical implications of their actions.
Even well-intentioned people can make unethical decisions or behave unethically, often unknowingly and due to factors beyond their immediate control or awareness.
Bounded ethicality is the idea that our ability to make ethical choices is often limited or restricted because of internal and external pressures.
The concept suggests that people’s decision-making capabilities are not always perfectly rational, but are instead limited, or “bounded,” by factors such as cognitive biases, limited information, social pressures and time constraints.
Here are a few examples of how bounded ethicality can manifest:
- Ethical Fading: This occurs when the ethical aspects of a decision fade from view, and people focus on other aspects of the decision instead, such as profitability, efficiency or winning. For example, a business leader might make a decision that harms the environment because they are focused on financial metrics and fail to fully consider the ethical implications.
- Moral Licensing: Moral licensing is a psychological phenomenon where individuals feel justified in engaging in unethical behavior after previously acting morally. It’s as if past good deeds create a “moral bank account” that can be drawn from for future unethical act. For example, a person who did a good deed in the morning might feel licensed to act unethically in the afternoon, because they feel they have already proven their moral character.
- Conflict of Interest: This is a situation where a person’s personal interests conflict with their professional duties or responsibilities. Even when people try to be unbiased, research has shown that knowing they have a conflict of interest can unconsciously influence their decisions.
Understanding bounded ethicality can help individuals and organizations to better manage ethical behavior, by making them aware of the situations and cognitive biases that can lead to unethical actions, even when they have the best of intentions. It emphasizes the need for systems and policies that help guide ethical decision-making and behavior.
8. Moral Policing UPSC
Moral policing refers to the act of enforcing a particular set of moral standards or values on others through social pressure, intimidation, or even violence. It often involves individuals or groups dictating how others should behave, dress, or conduct their lives, often based on religious, cultural, or personal beliefs.
Key Characteristics of Moral Policing
- Imposition of Values
- Violation of Personal Liberty
- Use of Coercion coercion, threats, or violence
- Targeting Vulnerable Groups
Manifestations of Moral Policing
- Public Shaming
- Vigilante Justice
- Mob lynching
- Taking the law into one’s own hands to punish perceived moral offenders.
- Restrictions on Freedom of Expression
- Dress Codes and Behavior Restrictions
Negative Impacts of Moral Policing
- Erosion of Individual Freedom
- Social Division
- Violence and Intimidation
- Hindrance to creativity, innovation, and social progress.
Addressing Moral Policing
- Promote Tolerance and Diversity
- Educate the Public
- Support Victims
9. Role morality
Role morality is the idea that people can have different ethical standards depending on the social role they are fulfilling at a given time.
This means that individuals may behave, make decisions, or apply ethical principles differently when they are acting in their professional role compared to their personal life.
For example, a lawyer might be required to defend a client to the best of their ability, even if they personally believe the client to be guilty. In their professional role, their duty is to provide the best defense possible, even if this conflicts with their personal moral beliefs.
Role morality can sometimes lead to ethical dilemmas, especially when a person’s professional obligations conflict with their personal moral beliefs. Critics of role morality argue that ethical principles should be universal and should not change based on one’s role or profession. However, others argue that different roles carry different responsibilities, and that these responsibilities might sometimes require different ethical considerations.
10. Moral cognition
Moral cognition refers to the mental processes (brain’s role) that guide our judgments about what is right or wrong, good or bad. It’s a subfield of cognitive science and moral psychology, studying how we make moral decisions and judgments, and how we process moral information.
Research in moral cognition uses a variety of methods, including psychological experiments, brain imaging, and computational modeling, to understand these aspects of our moral thinking. It can help us understand why people disagree on moral issues, how moral behaviors develop and change over time, and how to encourage ethical behavior.
Moral cognition also involves the scientific study of the brain that is evolving along with technology.
Ethics PYQs UPSC – Topic Wise Collection
FAQs on Ethics Terminology UPSC
Ethics eBook for UPSC Self Study by Self Study Wala:
Best eBook of Ethics for UPSC and UPPCS (4th Edition, English)
Looking for the best books to prepare Ethics for UPSC and UPPCS? Welcome to “Best Book of Ethics for UPSC and UPPCS.” This book Ethics for UPSC is Written by Mohit Sharma (Director of Sankalp IAS Academy). Also available on Amazon Kindle eBooks Download Free Demo eBook
Gandhian Philosophy Ethics UPSC
Ethics UPSC